<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Not-Just-For-Giants  Giving Thanks Project</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.giantsquidshowcase.com/2009/11/17/not-just-for-giants-giving-thanks-project/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.giantsquidshowcase.com/2009/11/17/not-just-for-giants-giving-thanks-project/</link>
	<description>Featuring the Giant Squid Lensmasters at Squidoo.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 00:17:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: rms</title>
		<link>http://www.giantsquidshowcase.com/2009/11/17/not-just-for-giants-giving-thanks-project/comment-page-1/#comment-2644</link>
		<dc:creator>rms</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 13:55:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.giantsquidshowcase.com/?p=1865#comment-2644</guid>
		<description>I received a note from a concerned lensmaster about this post, Here is my reply:

First let me say that I am speaking from an organizer&#039;s point of view, not from Head Quarters.
Bonnie and I have discussed this topic many times.  We are here to help the lensmasters create successful lenses.

Whether a lensmaster is solely here to earn money for charity, or themselves, or even to do a little of both, community based  tribute lenses are just not useful.  And lately we are seeing more and more of them.  As I said, they are very nice, and yours happen to be exceptional.  But from an earnings point of view, I bet you aren&#039;t making a whole lot of money from them.  We&#039;d rather see people creating successful niche type lenses with greater earning potential.

My comment about not making any new lenses was because I didn&#039;t want to generate the creation of any more tribute lenses.  Leaving comments on our favorite lensmaster&#039;s lenses is far more helpful to them than another lens about them is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I received a note from a concerned lensmaster about this post, Here is my reply:</p>
<p>First let me say that I am speaking from an organizer&#8217;s point of view, not from Head Quarters.<br />
Bonnie and I have discussed this topic many times.  We are here to help the lensmasters create successful lenses.</p>
<p>Whether a lensmaster is solely here to earn money for charity, or themselves, or even to do a little of both, community based  tribute lenses are just not useful.  And lately we are seeing more and more of them.  As I said, they are very nice, and yours happen to be exceptional.  But from an earnings point of view, I bet you aren&#8217;t making a whole lot of money from them.  We&#8217;d rather see people creating successful niche type lenses with greater earning potential.</p>
<p>My comment about not making any new lenses was because I didn&#8217;t want to generate the creation of any more tribute lenses.  Leaving comments on our favorite lensmaster&#8217;s lenses is far more helpful to them than another lens about them is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gloria C-H</title>
		<link>http://www.giantsquidshowcase.com/2009/11/17/not-just-for-giants-giving-thanks-project/comment-page-1/#comment-2630</link>
		<dc:creator>Gloria C-H</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 21:41:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.giantsquidshowcase.com/?p=1865#comment-2630</guid>
		<description>Good idea</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good idea</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
